HYPOTHETICAL EXAMPLE
An operational scenario
A loose object near a work area damages an aircraft during a ground movement. The investigation involves the maintenance contractor, handler and airport rather than a single aircraft operator.
Illustrative example only; this is not a Montridge client or reported claim.
The insurance distinction
FOD guidance concerns prevention and airport management. It does not determine liability or guarantee insurance response. Aircraft custody, completed work and premises activity can point to different policy sections.
What to examine
Map towing routes, construction interfaces, equipment storage and debris inspections. Record who controls each area and how hazards are reported. FAA AC 150/5210-24A provides an airport FOD-management reference; the applicable requirements depend on context.
Evidence to gather
- Airside movement and towing procedures
- FOD inspection and reporting records
- Construction and handling agreements
- Relevant liability and hangarkeepers wording
Questions for your review
- Who controls the area before and during the movement?
- Are borrowed vehicles and contractor activities described?
- What evidence supports the incident timeline?
References and review status
- FAA airport FOD management AC 150/5210-24A
Airport FOD prevention guidance; not coverage determination
References support the indicated background topic. Review questions are educational analysis; no specific policy specimen has been supplied. Source checks: November 12, 2026.